On the Prevalence of Multiple-Account Cheating in Massive Open Online Learning

A replicant study

Conference Paper (2017)
Author(s)

Yingying Bao (External organisation)

Guanliang Chen (TU Delft - Web Information Systems)

Claudia Hauff (TU Delft - Web Information Systems)

Research Group
Web Information Systems
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2017
Language
English
Research Group
Web Information Systems
Pages (from-to)
262-265
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are a promising form of online education. However, the occurrence of academic dishonesty has been threatening MOOC certificates’ effectiveness as a serious tool for recruiters and employers. Recently, a large-scale study on the log traces from more than one hundred MOOCs created by Harvard and MIT has identified a specific cheating strategy viable in MOOCs: Copying Answers using Multiple Existences Online (CAMEO). In essence, learners create several accounts on a MOOC platform, request assessment solutions via some of the accounts, and then submit these “harvested” solutions in their main account to receive credit. In our work, we replicate the CAMEO implementation and apply it to ten edX MOOCs created by the Delft University of Technology. Our results show that in those MOOCs, 1.9% of certificates were likely earned through CAMEO cheating, a number comparable to the fraction of cheating observed in Harvard and MIT MOOCs.

Files

36833088.pdf
(pdf | 0.605 Mb)
License info not available