Monitoring neoadjuvant treatment-induced surgical benefit in GIST patients using CT-based radiological criteria

Journal Article (2024)
Author(s)

Ylva A. Weeda (Leiden University Medical Center)

Gijsbert M. Kalisvaart (Leiden University Medical Center)

Henk H. Hartgrink (Leiden University Medical Center)

Aart J. van der Molen (Leiden University Medical Center)

Hans Gelderblom (Leiden University Medical Center)

Judith Vmg Bovée (Leiden University Medical Center)

L.F. de Geus-Oei (University of Twente, Leiden University Medical Center, TU Delft - RST/Radiation, Science and Technology)

Willem Grootjans (Leiden University Medical Center)

J.A. van der Hage (Leiden University Medical Center)

Department
RST/Radiation, Science and Technology
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sopen.2024.07.002
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Department
RST/Radiation, Science and Technology
Volume number
20
Pages (from-to)
169-177
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Objective: This single-centre retrospective study aims to determine the incidence of therapy-induced surgical benefit in patients with non-metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) treated with neoadjuvant tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and evaluate whether this can be predicted by radiological response criteria. Methods: Thirty-nine non-metastatic GIST patients were treated with neoadjuvant TKI treatment, followed by curative-intended surgery, and monitored using contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT). Surgical benefit was independently assessed by two surgical oncologists and was defined by de-escalation of surgical strategy or reduced surgical complexity. Radiological response between baseline and the last preoperative scan was determined through RECIST 1.1, Choi and volumetric criteria. Results: In this patient cohort, median neoadjuvant treatment interval was 8.3 (IQR, 3.9–10.6) months. Surgical benefit was gained in 22/39 patients. When comparing radiological criteria to findings on surgical benefit, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for RECIST 1.1 (90 %, 100.0 % and 82 %), Choi (64 %, 24 %, and 96 %) and volumetry (95 %, 100.0 %, and 91 %) were calculated. In 30/39 patients, temporal changes in tumour size over the course of treatment was assessed. Tumour volume reduced significantly in the surgical-benefit group compared to the non-benefit group (72 % vs. 25 %, p < 0.01) within three months. 14/19 surgical-benefit patients had an initial volume reduction above 66 %, after which volume reduced slightly with a median 3.1 % (IQR, 2.1–7.8 %) reduction. Conclusion: Surgical benefit after neoadjuvant treatment was achieved in 56 % of patients and was most accurately reflected by size-based response criteria. In patients with therapy-induced surgical benefit, nearly all treatment-induced volume reductions were achieved within three months.