The contribution of stakeholder engagement to cultural significance assessment

The case of values-based conservation management planning for the Ocean Swimming Pool, Portugal

Journal Article (2024)
Author(s)

Teresa Cunha Ferreira (Universidade do Porto)

Pedro Murilo Freitas (Universidade do Porto)

Constanza Frigolett (Universidade do Porto)

Hugo Mendonça (Universidade do Porto)

A.M. Tarrafa Silva (TU Delft - Heritage & Architecture, Universidade do Porto)

Research Group
Heritage & Architecture
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43238-024-00138-z
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Research Group
Heritage & Architecture
Issue number
1
Volume number
8
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Introduction
Values-based approaches are among the best practices for management and conservation planning. However, cultural significance assessments (of the attributes and values of cultural heritage) have generally been performed by experts (top-down) instead of including expert and nonexpert communities (top-down and bottom-up).

Objectives
This paper presents a multitechnique approach in which different strategies are applied to assess the perceptions of cultural significance held by several actors (users, managers, staff, experts, children, students, virtual community) within the framework of the Keeping It Modern Grant awarded by the Getty Foundation (2020–2023) for the Ocean Swimming Pool (1960–1966) designed by Álvaro Siza in Matosinhos, Portugal.

Method
Interviews, surveys, social media analysis, and workshops with children, students, and experts were adopted for the method, and, whenever possible, the ‘Imagine Ballarat’ Love, Change and Imagine questions were utilised as a resourceful instrument for assessing the significance attributed by multiple stakeholders.

Results
Based on the results, stakeholders’ opinions and values regarding the heritage site could be compared, which revealed the relationship between the values and the groups of actors, thereby deepening the complexity of heritage sites as National Monuments.

Conclusion
By using this integrated perspective, we could define the cultural significance of a modern heritage site through an inclusive methodology while also establishing the grounds for conservation policies within a more broadly participative management of change.