A Participatory SWOT-Based Approach to Nature-Based Solutions Within Urban Fragile Territories

Operational Barriers and Strategic Roadmaps

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

Marta Dell’Ovo (Politecnico di Milano)

Giulia Datola (Politecnico di Milano)

Elena Di Pirro (University of Molise)

Silvia Ronchi (Politecnico di Milano)

Andrea Arcidiacono (Politecnico di Milano)

Sandy Attia (MoDusArchitects)

Diego Baronchelli (Mario Cucinella Architects)

Andrea Benedini (Politecnico di Milano)

Daniela Maiullari (TU Delft - Environmental Technology and Design)

undefined More Authors

DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.3390/land14091847 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Journal title
Land
Issue number
9
Volume number
14
Article number
1847
Downloads counter
86
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Nature-Based Solutions (NBSs) are increasingly financed in urban, regional, and national contexts due to their proven capacity to reduce climate risks and deliver multiple co-benefits. Several challenges affect the successful implementation and long-term maintenance of NBSs, especially in climate-sensitive and fragile urban territories (e.g., the Mediterranean basin), characterized by intense urbanization, environmental vulnerability, socio-economic disparities, and fragmented governance. Key barriers include difficulties in economically evaluating NBS benefits, uncertainty about their effectiveness under changing climate conditions, and implementing multi-functional projects with an interdisciplinary perspective. To address these challenges, a participatory process was conducted involving three thematic working tables focused on the following: (1) economic evaluation, (2) co-design for climate resilience, and (3) multi-functionality and disciplinary integration. All groups applied a shared SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) methodology structured in four phases: (i) individual reflection and collective brainstorming; (ii) collaborative SWOT matrix development; (iii) roadmaps formulation; and (iv) narrative synthesis and submission. Grounded in their knowledge and practical experiences, stakeholders identified operational barriers and strategic advantages to identify research gaps and designing adaptive, inclusive, and context-sensitive NBS roadmaps. Although the stakeholders were primarily based in Northern Italy, they also brought national and international experience, making the findings relevant and transferable to other urban areas in the Mediterranean and Europe, facing similar socio-environmental challenges and governance issues. Thus, the study supports more effective planning and governance in comparable contexts, emphasizing integrated and flexible approaches to address urban fragility and optimize projects governance and management.