The evolution of process-based hydrologic models

Historical challenges and the collective quest for physical realism

Journal Article (2017)
Authors

M. P. Clark (University Corporation for Atmospheric Research)

Marc Bierkens (Universiteit Utrecht)

Luis Samaniego (Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ)

Ross Woods (University of Bristol)

R. Uijlenhoet (Wageningen University & Research)

Katrina E. Bennett (Los Alamos National Laboratory)

Valentijn R.N. Pauwels (Monash University)

Xitian Cai (Princeton University)

Andrew W. Wood (University Corporation for Atmospheric Research)

Christa Peters-Lidard (NASA Goddard Space Flight Center)

Affiliation
External organisation
To reference this document use:
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3427-2017
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2017
Language
English
Affiliation
External organisation
Issue number
7
Volume number
21
Pages (from-to)
3427-3440
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3427-2017

Abstract

The diversity in hydrologic models has historically led to great controversy on the "correct" approach to process-based hydrologic modeling, with debates centered on the adequacy of process parameterizations, data limitations and uncertainty, and computational constraints on model analysis. In this paper, we revisit key modeling challenges on requirements to (1) define suitable model equations, (2) define adequate model parameters, and (3) cope with limitations in computing power. We outline the historical modeling challenges, provide examples of modeling advances that address these challenges, and define outstanding research needs. We illustrate how modeling advances have been made by groups using models of different type and complexity, and we argue for the need to more effectively use our diversity of modeling approaches in order to advance our collective quest for physically realistic hydrologic models.

No files available

Metadata only record. There are no files for this record.