Small-Scale ASR Between Flow Barriers in a Saline Aquifer

Journal Article (2016)
Author(s)

M. van Ginkel (Royal HaskoningDHV, TU Delft - Water Resources)

Bas des des Tombe (TU Delft - Water Resources)

TN Olsthoorn (Waternet, TU Delft - Water Resources)

M Bakker (TU Delft - Water Resources)

Research Group
Water Resources
Copyright
© 2016 M. van Ginkel, B.F. des Tombe, T.N. Olsthoorn, M. Bakker
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12427
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2016
Language
English
Copyright
© 2016 M. van Ginkel, B.F. des Tombe, T.N. Olsthoorn, M. Bakker
Research Group
Water Resources
Issue number
6
Volume number
54
Pages (from-to)
840-850
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Regular aquifer storage recovery, ASR, is often not feasible for small-scale storage in brackish or saline aquifers because fresh water floats to the top of the aquifer where it is unrecoverable. Flow barriers that partially penetrate a brackish or saline aquifer prevent a stored volume of fresh water from expanding sideways, thus increasing the recovery efficiency. In this paper, the groundwater flow and mixing is studied during injection, storage, and recovery of fresh water in a brackish or saline aquifer in a flow-tank experiment and by numerical modeling to investigate the effect of density difference, hydraulic conductivity, pumping rate, cyclic operation, and flow barrier settings. Two injection and recovery methods are investigated: constant flux and constant head. Fresh water recovery rates on the order of 65% in the first cycle climbing to as much as 90% in the following cycles were achievable for the studied configurations with constant flux whereas the recovery efficiency was somewhat lower for constant head. The spatial variation in flow velocity over the width of the storage zone influences the recovery efficiency, because it induces leakage of fresh water underneath the barriers during injection and upconing of salt water during recovery.