Toward a low-carbon and circular building sector

Building strategies and urbanization pathways for the Netherlands

Journal Article (2023)
Author(s)

Janneke van Oorschot (Universiteit Leiden)

B. Sprecher (TU Delft - Design for Sustainability)

Bart Rijken (Planbureau voor de Leefomgeving)

Pieter Witteveen (Metabolic Institute, Amsterdam)

Merlijn Blok (Metabolic Institute, Amsterdam)

Nico Schouten (Metabolic Institute, Amsterdam)

Ester Van Der Voet (Universiteit Leiden)

Research Group
Design for Sustainability
Copyright
© 2023 Janneke van Oorschot, B. Sprecher, Bart Rijken, Pieter Witteveen, Merlijn Blok, Nico Schouten, Ester van der Voet
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13375
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Copyright
© 2023 Janneke van Oorschot, B. Sprecher, Bart Rijken, Pieter Witteveen, Merlijn Blok, Nico Schouten, Ester van der Voet
Research Group
Design for Sustainability
Issue number
2
Volume number
27
Pages (from-to)
535-547
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Buildings are an important part of society's environmental impacts, both in the construction and in the use phase. As the energy performance of buildings improve, construction materials become more important as a cause of environmental impact. Less attention has been given to those materials. We explore, as an alternative for conventional buildings, the use of biobased materials and circular building practices. In addition to building design, we analyze the effect of urbanization. We assess the potential to close material cycles together with the material related impact, between 2018 and 2050 in the Netherlands. Our results show a limited potential to close material cycles until 2050, as a result of slow stock turnover and growth of the building stock. At present, end-of-life recycling rates are low, further limiting circularity. Primary material demand can be lowered when shifting toward biobased or circular construction. This shift also reduces material related carbon emissions. Large-scale implementation of biobased construction, however, drastically increases land area required for wood production. Material demand differs strongly spatially and depends on the degree of urbanization. Urbanization results in higher building replacement rates, but constructed dwellings are generally small compared to scenarios with more rural developments. The approach presented in this work can be used to analyze strategies aimed at closing material cycles in the building sector and lowering buildings' embodied environmental impact, at different spatial scales.