Beyond Nature-Based Solutions

Abstract

Contemporary approaches to urban water management increasingly rely on concepts such as Nature-Based Solutions (NBSs), Green Infrastructure, and Blue-Green Infrastructure. Although these frameworks have gained broad acceptance, their typological character provides limited guidance for project-oriented decision-making, as they primarily describe infrastructure types rather than their functions within integrated hydrological systems. To address this gap, this study proposes a complementary functional-operational framework for interpreting ecological infrastructures in urban flood mitigation. Employing a qualitative comparative case study methodology, we analysed four diverse international models—the Dutch Water Squares (Rotterdam), Tokyo’s underground flood control system, Copenhagen’s Cloudburst Management Plan, and Singapore’s ABC Waters Programme—to examine the systemic interaction between grey, green, and blue infrastructures at different watershed scales. The results indicate that flood mitigation effectiveness depends less on the predominance of a single infrastructure type and more on the functional coupling among them. Specifically, three primary functions were identified: rapid conveyance (grey infrastructure), infiltration and thermal regulation (green infrastructure), and dynamic storage and biodiversity support (blue infrastructure). Despite the contextual limitations and varying scales of the selected cases, blue infrastructure universally emerges as a systemic buffer that enhances urban resilience by regulating excess volumetric flows. Ultimately, the proposed framework introduces an actionable interpretative layer that complements existing typological classifications, providing planners and urban designers with a robust, scalable basis for implementing integrated ecological infrastructures.