Strategic programmes for circular construction: lessons from three public clients

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

Manon Eikelenboom (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

Mart Van Uden (TU Delft - Design & Construction Management, Maastricht University)

Tom B.J. Coenen (University of Twente)

Lynn Vosman (University of Twente)

Research Group
Design & Construction Management
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2025.2539129
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Design & Construction Management
Issue number
11
Volume number
43
Pages (from-to)
901-921
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Strategic programmes are frequently employed by organisations to drive transformational change, particularly when sectors pursue systemic shifts, such as the circularity transition. However, despite their potential, these programmes often fail to effect lasting change within their parent organisations, with outcomes remaining disconnected. This study examines how programme integration mechanisms shape organisational transformation in circularity-oriented change programmes. Several mechanisms were identified through a comparative case study of Dutch public construction clients. The findings suggest that isolating such programmes from the parent organisation hinders organisational transformation. Instead, the early incorporation of integration mechanisms is essential to facilitate both learning and unlearning processes, ensuring the effective and sustainable adoption of circular practices. Moreover, findings show that temporal alignment emerges as a decisive factor in a programme’s transformative capacity, as mismatches between programme and organisational learning trajectories can limit systemic impact. These insights contribute to strategic programme literature by demonstrating how these programmes can, depending on their formal and informal mechanisms, promote or stall transformative change.