No reinduction of clinically relevant radioiodine uptake after lenvatinib treatment in radioidine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer
Maaike Dotinga (Netherlands Cancer Institute, Leiden University Medical Center)
Lioe Fee de Geus-Oei (Leiden University Medical Center, University of Twente, TU Delft - RST/Radiation, Science and Technology)
Floris H.P. van Velden (Leiden University Medical Center)
Mette K. Stam (Leiden University Medical Center)
Jan W.T. Heemskerk (Leiden University Medical Center)
Petra Dibbets-Schneider (Leiden University Medical Center)
Frits Smit (Leiden University Medical Center)
Dennis Vriens (Radboud University Medical Center)
Ellen Kapiteijn (Leiden University Medical Center)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
Background: Prior studies show that short-term treatment using tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) can reinduce radioiodine uptake and warrant 131I therapy in radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RAI-R DTC). We aim to evaluate the potential of standard-of-care TKI lenvatinib to reinduce clinically meaningful radioiodine retention. Methods: Nine RAI-R DTC patients starting lenvatinib treatment for progressive advanced or metastatic disease, were included and underwent rhTSH-stimulated 124I dosimetric procedures at baseline, week 6 (N=7) and week 12 (N=8). At all timepoints, the fraction of patients eligible for 131I therapy with a maximal activity of 7.4 GBq was assessed. Patients were considered eligible if at least one target lesion showed an expected mean absorbed dose ≥20 Gy. In total, 23 target lesions were segmented on124I PET/CT images and their volumes estimated using low-dose CT images. Lesion size-specific recovery correction was applied to the measured mean activity concentration at each timepoint. Tumor dosimetry was performed using a mono-exponential fit and S-values from an internal dosimetry program for diagnostic nuclear medicine based on the ICRP adult reference voxel phantoms (IDAC-Dose2.1). Mean absorbed lesion dose per administered activity (LDpA), 24h-uptake and residence time in target lesions were compared between time points. Results: By our definition, none of the patients were found eligible for 131I therapy at any timepoint. Lenvatinib-induced partial response was observed in 59% and 75% of target lesions at week 6 and 12, respectively. Median LDpA was 0.08 (IQR: 0.04-0.17), 0.18 (0.08-0.36) and 0.17 (0.09-0.37) Gy/GBq for week 0, 6 and 12, respectively (p=0.08). The 24h-uptake and residence time were comparable between timepoints (p>0.22). Conclusion: Redifferentiation of RAI-R DTC to reinduce radioiodine uptake to a level that warrants 131I therapy may not be established by short-term lenvatinib treatment. Multi-targeted TKIs may not be as potent as selective TKIs in reinducing clinically meaningful radioiodine retention.