No reinduction of clinically relevant radioiodine uptake after lenvatinib treatment in radioidine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

Maaike Dotinga (Netherlands Cancer Institute, Leiden University Medical Center)

Lioe Fee de Geus-Oei (Leiden University Medical Center, University of Twente, TU Delft - RST/Radiation, Science and Technology)

Floris H.P. van Velden (Leiden University Medical Center)

Mette K. Stam (Leiden University Medical Center)

Jan W.T. Heemskerk (Leiden University Medical Center)

Petra Dibbets-Schneider (Leiden University Medical Center)

Frits Smit (Leiden University Medical Center)

Dennis Vriens (Radboud University Medical Center)

Ellen Kapiteijn (Leiden University Medical Center)

DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-025-07662-9 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Journal title
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Downloads counter
44
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Background: Prior studies show that short-term treatment using tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) can reinduce radioiodine uptake and warrant 131I therapy in radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RAI-R DTC). We aim to evaluate the potential of standard-of-care TKI lenvatinib to reinduce clinically meaningful radioiodine retention. Methods: Nine RAI-R DTC patients starting lenvatinib treatment for progressive advanced or metastatic disease, were included and underwent rhTSH-stimulated 124I dosimetric procedures at baseline, week 6 (N=7) and week 12 (N=8). At all timepoints, the fraction of patients eligible for 131I therapy with a maximal activity of 7.4 GBq was assessed. Patients were considered eligible if at least one target lesion showed an expected mean absorbed dose ≥20 Gy. In total, 23 target lesions were segmented on124I PET/CT images and their volumes estimated using low-dose CT images. Lesion size-specific recovery correction was applied to the measured mean activity concentration at each timepoint. Tumor dosimetry was performed using a mono-exponential fit and S-values from an internal dosimetry program for diagnostic nuclear medicine based on the ICRP adult reference voxel phantoms (IDAC-Dose2.1). Mean absorbed lesion dose per administered activity (LDpA), 24h-uptake and residence time in target lesions were compared between time points. Results: By our definition, none of the patients were found eligible for 131I therapy at any timepoint. Lenvatinib-induced partial response was observed in 59% and 75% of target lesions at week 6 and 12, respectively. Median LDpA was 0.08 (IQR: 0.04-0.17), 0.18 (0.08-0.36) and 0.17 (0.09-0.37) Gy/GBq for week 0, 6 and 12, respectively (p=0.08). The 24h-uptake and residence time were comparable between timepoints (p>0.22). Conclusion: Redifferentiation of RAI-R DTC to reinduce radioiodine uptake to a level that warrants 131I therapy may not be established by short-term lenvatinib treatment. Multi-targeted TKIs may not be as potent as selective TKIs in reinducing clinically meaningful radioiodine retention.