Integrating fairness in opponent modeling
I. Trestioreanu (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)
Sietze Kai Kuilman – Mentor (TU Delft - Interactive Intelligence)
Luciano Cavalcante Siebert – Mentor (TU Delft - Interactive Intelligence)
Michael Weinmann – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Computer Graphics and Visualisation)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
Is there a way to incorporate fairness in the opponent modeling component of an automated agent? Since opponent modeling plays an important role in a negotiation strategy, it is reasonable to research how fairness can be integrated into this component, as it influences the outcome of the negotiation. A first step towards finding an answer to this question is to define fairness and how this definition can be translated to algorithmic fairness. The next step is to investigate already available opponent models and assess whether their strategy can be considered fair or not. This paper analyses the process of Bayesian learning in the context of opponent modeling, and tries to reveal possible flaws or strengths that the model has embedded in it, with the hope to add relevant information in the area of automated negotiation.