The Unity of Dependence

Journal Article (2022)
Author(s)

J.J. Casey (TU Delft - Ethics & Philosophy of Technology)

Research Group
Ethics & Philosophy of Technology
Copyright
© 2022 J.J. Casey
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2021.5
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 J.J. Casey
Research Group
Ethics & Philosophy of Technology
Issue number
2
Volume number
8
Pages (from-to)
300-317
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Most philosophers treat ontological dependence and metaphysical dependence as distinct relations. A number of key differences between the two relations are usually cited in support of this claim: ontological dependence’s unique connection to existence, differing respective connections to metaphysical necessitation, and a divergence in their formal features. Alongside reshaping some of the examples used to maintain the distinction between the two, I argue that the additional resources offered by the increased attention the notion of grounding has received in recent years potentially offer us a way to unite the two relations, promising the attendant benefits parsimony offers, as a result.