Clouds dissipate quickly during solar eclipses as the land surface cools

Journal Article (2024)
Author(s)

Victor J.H. Trees (Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI), TU Delft - Atmospheric Remote Sensing)

Stephan De Roode (TU Delft - Atmospheric Remote Sensing)

Job I. Wiltink (Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI), Wageningen University & Research)

Jan Fokke Meirink (Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI))

P. Wang (TU Delft - Atmospheric Remote Sensing, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI))

Piet Stammes (Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI))

A. Pier Siebesma (TU Delft - Atmospheric Remote Sensing)

Research Group
Atmospheric Remote Sensing
Copyright
© 2024 V.J.H. Trees, S.R. de Roode, Job I. Wiltink, Jan Fokke Meirink, P. Wang, Piet Stammes, A.P. Siebesma
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01213-0
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Copyright
© 2024 V.J.H. Trees, S.R. de Roode, Job I. Wiltink, Jan Fokke Meirink, P. Wang, Piet Stammes, A.P. Siebesma
Research Group
Atmospheric Remote Sensing
Issue number
1
Volume number
5
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Clouds affected by solar eclipses could influence the reflection of sunlight back into space and might change local precipitation patterns. Satellite cloud retrievals have so far not taken into account the lunar shadow, hindering a reliable spaceborne assessment of the eclipse-induced cloud evolution. Here we use satellite cloud measurements during three solar eclipses between 2005 and 2016 that have been corrected for the partial lunar shadow together with large-eddy simulations to analyze the eclipse-induced cloud evolution. Our corrected data reveal that, over cooling land surfaces, shallow cumulus clouds start to disappear at very small solar obscurations (~15%). Our simulations explain that the cloud response was delayed and was initiated at even smaller solar obscurations. We demonstrate that neglecting the disappearance of clouds during a solar eclipse could lead to a considerable overestimation of the eclipse-related reduction of net incoming solar radiation. These findings should spur cloud model simulations of the direct consequences of sunlight-intercepting geoengineering proposals, for which our results serve as a unique benchmark.