Ipsilateral Scapular Cutaneous Anchor System

An alternative for the harness in body-powered upper-limb prostheses

Journal Article (2018)
Author(s)

Mona Hichert (TU Delft - Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control)

Dick Plettenburg (TU Delft - Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control)

Research Group
Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control
Copyright
© 2017 M. Hichert, D.H. Plettenburg
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1177/0309364617691624
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2018
Language
English
Copyright
© 2017 M. Hichert, D.H. Plettenburg
Research Group
Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control
Issue number
1
Volume number
42
Pages (from-to)
101-106
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Background: Body-powered prosthesis users frequently complain about the poor cosmesis and comfort of the traditional shoulder harness. The Ipsilateral Scapular Cutaneous Anchor System offers an alternative, but it remains unclear to what extent it affects the perception and control of cable operation forces compared to the traditional shoulder harness.
Objective: To compare cable force perception and control with the figure-of-nine harness versus the Ipsilateral Scapular Cutaneous Anchor System and to investigate force perception and control at different force levels.
Study design: Experimental trial.
Methods: Ten male able-bodied subjects completed a cable force reproduction task at four force levels in the range of 10–40 N using the figure-of-nine harness and the Anchor System. Perception and control of cable operating forces were quantified by the force reproduction error and the force variability.
Results: In terms of force reproduction error and force variability, the subjects did not behave differently when using the two systems. The smallest force reproduction error and force variability were found at the smallest target force level of 10 N.
Conclusion: The Anchor System performs no differently than the traditional figure-of-nine harness in terms of force perception and control, making it a viable alternative. Furthermore, users perceive and control low operation forces
better than high forces.