Evolution of geometric phase and explaining the geodesic rule

Journal Article (2024)
Author(s)

Nathan Hagen (Utsunomiya University)

L.A. Garza Soto (TU Delft - Group Anisimov, Utsunomiya University)

Research Group
Group Anisimov
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.538106
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Research Group
Group Anisimov
Issue number
11
Volume number
41
Pages (from-to)
2014-2022
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

We use the recently developed wave model of geometric phase to track the continuous evolution of geometric phase as a wave propagates through optical elements and throughout an optical system. By working directly with the wave properties, we encounter a natural explanation of why the conventional Poincaré sphere solid angle method must use geodesic paths rather than the physical paths of the polarization state—the “geodesic rule”—and show that the existing rules for the solid angle algorithm are incomplete. Finally, we use the physical model to clarify the differences between the Pancharatnam connection and the geometric phase of a wave.

Files

Josaa-41-11-2014.pdf
(pdf | 1.23 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 14-04-2025
License info not available