Temporal evolution of backward erosion piping in small-scale experiments

Journal Article (2022)
Author(s)

Joost Pol (HKV Lijn in Water, TU Delft - Hydraulic Structures and Flood Risk)

Willem Kanning (TU Delft - Hydraulic Structures and Flood Risk, Deltares)

Vera M. van Beek (Deltares)

Bryant A. Robbins (Colorado School of Mines, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center)

SN Jonkman (TU Delft - Hydraulic Structures and Flood Risk)

Research Group
Hydraulic Structures and Flood Risk
Copyright
© 2022 J.C. Pol, W. Kanning, Vera M. van Beek, Bryant A. Robbins, Sebastiaan N. Jonkman
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-022-01545-1
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 J.C. Pol, W. Kanning, Vera M. van Beek, Bryant A. Robbins, Sebastiaan N. Jonkman
Research Group
Hydraulic Structures and Flood Risk
Issue number
10
Volume number
17
Pages (from-to)
4555-4576
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Backward erosion piping (BEP) is a form of internal erosion which can lead to failure of levees and dams. Most research focused on the critical head difference at which piping failure occurs. Two aspects have received less attention, namely (1) the temporal evolution of piping and (2) the local hydraulic conditions in the pipe and at the pipe tip. We present small-scale experiments with local pressure measurements in the pipe during equilibrium and pipe progression for different sands and degrees of hydraulic loading. The experiments confirm a positive relation between progression rate and grain size as well as the degree of hydraulic overloading. Furthermore, the analysis of local hydraulic conditions shows that the rate of BEP progression can be better explained by the bed shear stress and sediment transport in the pipe than by the seepage velocity at the pipe tip. The experiments show how different processes contribute to the piping process and these insights provide a first empirical basis for modeling pipe development using coupled seepage-sediment transport equations.