Riblet-generated flow mechanisms that lead to local breaking of Reynolds analogy
Amirreza Rouhi (University of Melbourne, Nottingham Trent University)
Sebastian Endrikat (University of Melbourne)
D. Modesti (University of Melbourne, TU Delft - Aerodynamics)
Richard D. Sandberg (University of Melbourne)
Takuo Oda (Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Thermal Systems, Ltd.)
Koichi Tanimoto (Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Thermal Systems, Ltd.)
Nicholas Hutchins (University of Melbourne)
Daniel Chung (University of Melbourne)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
We investigate the Reynolds analogy over riblets, namely the analogy between the fractional increase in Stanton number Ch and the fractional increase in the skin-friction coefficient Cf, relative to a smooth surface. We investigate the direct numerical simulation data of Endrikat et al. (Flow Turbul. Combust., vol. 107, 2021, pp. 1–29). The riblet groove shapes are isosceles triangles with tip angles α=30∘,60∘,90∘, a trapezoid, a rectangle and a right triangle. The viscous-scaled riblet spacing varies between s+≈10 to 60. The global Reynolds analogy is primarily influenced by Kelvin–Helmholtz rollers and secondary flows. Kelvin–Helmholtz rollers locally break the Reynolds analogy favourably, i.e. cause a locally larger fractional increase in Ch than in Cf. These rollers induce negative wall shear stress patches which have no analogue in wall heat fluxes. Secondary flows at the riblets’ crests are associated with local unfavourable breaking of the Reynolds analogy, i.e. locally larger fractional increase in Cf than in Ch. Only the triangular riblets with α=30∘ trigger strong Kelvin–Helmholtz rollers without appreciable secondary flows. This riblet shape globally preserves the Reynolds analogy from s+=21 to 33. However, the other riblet shapes have weak or non-existent Kelvin–Helmholtz rollers, yet persistent secondary flows. These riblet shapes behave similarly to rough surfaces. They unfavourably break the global Reynolds analogy, and do so to a greater extent as s+ increases.