Evidence for Abiotic Dimethyl Sulfide in Cometary Matter

Journal Article (2024)
Author(s)

Nora Hänni (University of Bern)

Kathrin Altwegg (University of Bern)

Michael Combi (University of Michigan)

Stephen A. Fuselier (Southwest Research Institute, The University of Texas at San Antonio)

Johan De Keyser (Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (BIRA-IASB))

Niels F.W. Ligterink (TU Delft - Planetary Exploration, University of Bern)

Martin Rubin (University of Bern)

Susanne F. Wampfler (University of Bern)

Research Group
Planetary Exploration
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad8565
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Research Group
Planetary Exploration
Issue number
1
Volume number
976
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Technological progress related to astronomical observatories such as the recently launched James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) allows searching for signs of life beyond our solar system, namely, in the form of unambiguous biosignature gases in exoplanetary atmospheres. The tentative assignment of a 1σ-2.4σ spectral feature observed with JWST in the atmosphere of exoplanet K2-18b to the biosignature gas dimethyl sulfide (DMS; sum formula C2H6S) raised hopes that, although controversial, a second genesis had been found. Terrestrial atmospheric DMS is exclusively stemming from marine biological activity, and no natural abiotic source has been identified—neither on Earth nor in space. Therefore, DMS is considered a robust biosignature. Since comets possess a pristine inventory of complex organic molecules of abiotic origin, we have searched high-resolution mass spectra collected at comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, target of the European Space Agency’s Rosetta mission, for the signatures of DMS. Previous work reported the presence of a C2H6S signal when the comet was near its equinox, but distinction of DMS from its structural isomer ethanethiol remained elusive. Here we reassess these and evaluate additional data. Based on differences in the electron ionization-induced fragmentation pattern of the two isomers, we show that DMS is significantly better compatible with the observations. Deviations between expected and observed signal intensities for DMS are <1σ, while for ethanethiol they are 2σ-4σ. The local abundance of DMS relative to methanol deduced from these data is (0.13 ± 0.04)%. Our results provide the first evidence for the existence of an abiotic synthetic pathway to DMS in pristine cometary matter and hence motivate more detailed studies of the sulfur chemistry in such matter and its analogs. Future studies need to investigate whether or not the present inference of cometary DMS could provide an abiotic source of DMS in a planetary atmosphere.