Size and Promoter Effects in Supported Iron Fischer–Tropsch Catalysts

Insights from Experiment and Theory

Journal Article (2016)
Author(s)

Jingxiu Xie (Universiteit Utrecht)

Jia Yang (Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU))

Achim Iulian Dugulan (TU Delft - RST/Fundamental Aspects of Materials and Energy)

Anders Holmen (Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU))

De Chen (Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU))

Krijn P. de Jong (Universiteit Utrecht)

Manuel J. Louwerse (Universiteit Utrecht)

Research Group
RST/Fundamental Aspects of Materials and Energy
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.6b00131
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2016
Language
English
Research Group
RST/Fundamental Aspects of Materials and Energy
Issue number
5
Volume number
6
Pages (from-to)
3147-3157

Abstract

The fundamentals of structure sensitivity and promoter effects in the Fischer–Tropsch synthesis of lower olefins have been studied. Steady state isotopic transient kinetic analysis, switching 12CO to 13CO and H2 to D2, was used to provide coverages and residence times for reactive species on supported iron carbide particles of 2–7 nm with and without promoters (Na + S). CO coverages appeared to be too low to be measured, suggesting dissociative adsorption of CO. Fitting of CH4 response curves revealed the presence of parallel side-pools of reacting carbon. CHx coverages decreased with increasing particle size, and this is rationalized by smaller particles having a higher number of highly active low coordination sites. It was also established that the turnover frequency increased with CHx coverage. To calculate H coverages, new equations were derived to fit HD response curves, again leading to a parallel side-pool model. The H coverages appeared to be lower for bigger particles. The H coverage was suppressed upon addition of promoters in line with lower methane selectivity and higher lower olefin selectivity. Density functional theory (DFT) was applied on H adsorption for a fundamental understanding of this promoter effect on the selectivities, with a special focus on counterion effects. Na2S is a better promoter than Na2O due to both a larger negative charge donation and a more effective binding configuration. On the unpromoted Fe5C2 (111) surface, H atoms bind preferably on C after dissociation on Fe. On Na2S-promoted Fe5C2 surfaces, adsorption on carbon sites weakens, and adsorption on iron sites strengthens, which fits with lower H coverage, less CH4 formation, and more olefin formation.

No files available

Metadata only record. There are no files for this record.