Comparative performance evaluation of biomass chemical looping against conventional gasification technologies

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

Avishek Goel (Tampere University)

Fabiola Panitz (Technische Universität Darmstadt)

Elyas M. Moghaddam (TU Delft - Mechanical Engineering)

Jochen Ströhle (Technische Universität Darmstadt)

Bernd Epple (Technische Universität Darmstadt)

Chao He (Tampere University)

Jukka Konttinen (Tampere University)

Research Group
Complex Fluid Processing
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2026.101828 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Complex Fluid Processing
Journal title
Energy Conversion and Management: X
Volume number
30
Article number
101828
Downloads counter
8
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Biomass chemical looping gasification (BCLG) is emerging as a promising alternative to conventional gasification, addressing inherent limitations. This study systematically compares BCLG with conventional methods like air and air/steam gasification, using pine forest residue in an allothermal fluidized bed reactor. Key operational parameters such as reactor temperature (800–900 °C), equivalence ratio (0.18–0.36) and steam-to-biomass ratio (1.3) were examined. Performance indicators such as gas composition, yields, carbon conversion, and cold gas efficiency were evaluated and compared. BCLG without steam displayed similar performance to conventional methods. However, the performance of BCLG with steam surpassed conventional gasification methods and emerged as the most promising process. The results suggest enhanced catalytic performance of nickel smelter slag for reforming reactions under steam-rich conditions, with H2/CO ratio, product gas yield, cold gas and carbon conversion efficiency improved by approximately 111%, 30%, 14% and 2%, respectively, compared to air/steam gasification.