Risk-based maintenance and inspection of riverine flood defence systems

Journal Article (2023)
Author(s)

W. J. Klerk (Deltares, TU Delft - Hydraulic Structures and Flood Risk)

Vera van Bergeijk (University of Twente, Deltares)

Wim Kanning (TU Delft - Hydraulic Structures and Flood Risk, Deltares)

A. R. (Rogier) M. Rogier Wolfert (TU Delft - Engineering Structures)

Matthijs Kok (TU Delft - Hydraulic Structures and Flood Risk)

Research Group
Hydraulic Structures and Flood Risk
Copyright
© 2023 W.J. Klerk, Vera van Bergeijk, W. Kanning, A.R.M. Wolfert, M. Kok
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2023.102406
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Copyright
© 2023 W.J. Klerk, Vera van Bergeijk, W. Kanning, A.R.M. Wolfert, M. Kok
Research Group
Hydraulic Structures and Flood Risk
Volume number
106
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The condition of flood defence revetments is influenced by many different degradation processes such as animal burrowing, rutting and growth of weeds. Many of these processes are shock-based rather than progressive continuous. As shocks can cause a drop in performance, this means that the condition of a revetment can suddenly decrease, meaning that revetments can have significant initial damage at the beginning of a storm. Combined with the limited detection probability of common visual inspections of flood defences, this can have a significant influence on the reliability of flood defence systems, something typically not considered in reliability analysis. In this paper we study the reliability of a flood defence system subject to shock-based degradation. Various maintenance concepts are compared for a case study of a riverine flood defence of 20 kilometres length. This demonstrates that the current maintenance concept is insufficient to satisfy the reliability requirements for failure of the revetment. Overall, the joint influence of degradation and the existing maintenance concept leads to a 20 times higher failure probability estimate compared to a typical assessment without these aspects. Next, we demonstrate that both additional inspections, and targeted interventions to reduce the impact of for instance animal burrowing, can significantly reduce total cost and improve robustness of the considered flood defence system.