Platform control during battles for market dominance: The case of Apple versus IBM in the early personal computer industry

Journal Article (2016)
Author(s)

E den Hartigh (Özyeğin University)

J.R. Ortt (TU Delft - Economics of Technology and Innovation)

G Van De Kaa (TU Delft - Economics of Technology and Innovation)

CCM Stolwijk (TNO)

Research Group
Technology, Strategy and Entrepreneurship
Copyright
© 2016 E den Hartigh, J.R. Ortt, G. van de Kaa, C.C.M. Stolwijk
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.12.001
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2016
Language
English
Copyright
© 2016 E den Hartigh, J.R. Ortt, G. van de Kaa, C.C.M. Stolwijk
Research Group
Technology, Strategy and Entrepreneurship
Volume number
48-49
Pages (from-to)
4-12
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

We conduct a case study of the battle for market dominance between the industry platforms led by Apple and by IBM in the early personal computer industry (1977–1986). Platform leaders such as Apple or IBM need to consider many technological, strategic, and network factors in managing their industry platforms. We explore how platform leaders deploy these factors and their interactions during a battle for market dominance. We find that platform leaders choose various control modes to do so, ranging from central control to distributed control. The adoption of these control modes is dependent on the choice of being first entrant with a technological discontinuity (central control) or follower (distributed control). Within a control mode, technological, strategic, and network factors are managed in a coherent way.

Previous article in issue

Files

1_s2.0_S0166497215000917_main.... (pdf)
(pdf | 0.615 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 30-06-2016
License info not available