Architecture on Display

Spatial choreography between public access and institutional authority in the Netherlands Architecture Institute

Student Report (2026)
Author(s)

L.C. Gijrath (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

Contributor(s)

J.S. Zeinstra – Mentor (TU Delft - Architecture and the Built Environment)

Faculty
Architecture and the Built Environment
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Coordinates
51.914341, 4.471213
Graduation Date
20-04-2026
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Project
AR2A011, Architectural History Thesis
Programme
Architecture, Urbanism and Building Sciences
Faculty
Architecture and the Built Environment
Downloads counter
14
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This thesis examines how the architectural design of the Netherlands Architecture Institute (NAi) in Rotterdam (1993), by Jo Coenen, constructs a spatial choreography between public accessibility and institutional authority. Rather than treating the building as a neutral container, it approaches it as a sequence of spaces that organises movement, frames experience, and gives architecture cultural meaning.

Set within the Dutch 1990s—when architecture gained unusual public and political visibility—the NAi was tasked not only with housing exhibitions, research, and archives, but also with representing architecture itself. Through an analysis of plans, drawings, photographs, and spatial sequences, this thesis argues that Coenen responds to this challenge by carefully staging access. The building guides visitors from the city into a layered interior, moving from open public spaces toward more controlled domains, such as exhibition areas and the archive.

In this way, the NAi organises not only functions, but also importance. It presents architecture as a public cultural field while simultaneously framing it institutionally. The thesis shows that the building mediates between openness and authority not by removing hierarchy, but by deliberately designing it.

Files

License info not available