Antecedents and outcomes of work-related flow

A meta-analysis

Journal Article (2023)
Author(s)

Wei Liu (TU Delft - Form and Experience)

Hairong Lu ( Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam)

Peikai Li (Universiteit Gent)

Dimitri van der Linden ( Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam)

A.B. Bakker (University of Johannesburg, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam)

Research Group
Form and Experience
Copyright
© 2023 Wei Liu, Hairong Lu, Peikai Li, Dimitri van der Linden, A.B. Bakker
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2023.103891
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Copyright
© 2023 Wei Liu, Hairong Lu, Peikai Li, Dimitri van der Linden, A.B. Bakker
Research Group
Form and Experience
Volume number
144
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Flow is an optimal state that contributes positively to individual well-being and performance. Despite growing evidence of its antecedents and outcomes at work, few efforts have been made to systematically examine and synthesize the extant findings to advance the theoretical and empirical development of flow. Combining different perspectives (e.g., job demands and resources theory, proactivity and leadership literatures), we aim to identify the key antecedents and outcomes relevant to work-related flow, and (a) provide a nomological network and (b) spot areas for future research on flow. We conducted a meta-analysis to synthesize findings (N = 60,110, k = 113). Results showed that several factors, including job characteristics, individual characteristics, individual behaviors, and leadership characteristics were significantly related to flow. Individual behavior displayed the strongest association with flow (ρ = 0.55). In addition, flow was not only related to job outcomes but also to personal outcomes. We also investigated the relative contribution of sub-dimensions of flow to well-being and performance. The relationships between flow and its associates hold across different measures of flow and culture. Our findings suggest that employees can use more proactive strategies to foster flow rather than only respond to their environment. Despite the short-run side effects of flow (e.g., risk-taking behavior), flow is worth pursuing in the long run as it benefits both work and personal well-being. We encourage future flow studies to investigate additional social and situational factors and various types of proactive behaviors in a multilevel process.