Experimental Study on Dual-Energy Cone-Beam CT for Proton Therapy Planning

Conference Paper (2026)
Author(s)

David Leibold (TU Delft - Applied Sciences)

Marlies C. Goorden (TU Delft - Applied Sciences)

Dennis R. Schaart (TU Delft - Applied Sciences, Holland Proton Therapy Centre)

Research Group
RST/Medical Physics & Technology
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3085612 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
RST/Medical Physics & Technology
Article number
1392427
Publisher
SPIE
ISBN (electronic)
9781510697850
Event
Medical Imaging 2026: Physics of Medical Imaging (2025-02-15 - 2025-02-19), Vancouver, Canada
Downloads counter
29
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The objective of this study is to test the ability of dual-energy CBCT to extract proton stopping power ratio (SPR) values for proton radiotherapy planning and to compare its performance to single-energy CBCT, while optimising the operating parameters of both single- and dual-energy CBCT for SPR extraction. We scanned three phantoms with a clinical CBCT installed in the gantry of a proton therapy facility at different source voltage and current settings. Dual-energy CBCT was emulated by combining scans from different kVps. We employed the Hünemohr-Saito method to predict SPR values for dual-energy CBCT scans, whereas we used a Hounsfield look-up table for predicting SPR values based on single-energy CT scans. The optimum operating parameters for dual-energy CBCT scans were an 80/125 kVp combination with a low/high kVp dose ratio of 75/25. This resulted in a relative mean error (RME) and a relative root mean square error (RRMSE) of (0.1 ± 1.2) % and (2.53±0.73) %, respectively. For single-energy CBCT scans, 125 kVp was determined to be the optimum voltage, yielding a RME and RRMSE value of (1.5±3.3) % and (7.1±6.9) %, respectively. Although limited in scope and in need of further experiments, this study indicates that dual-energy CBCT performs better than single-energy CBCT.

Files

GFTtCm4i.pdf
(pdf | 0.835 Mb)
Taverne
warning

File under embargo until 02-10-2026