Assessing direct CPT-based methods for predicting pile base resistance using coupled DEM-FDM simulations

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

Fei Chai (UNSW Canberra)

Bo Liu (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University)

J. Xue (UNSW Canberra)

Kevin Duffy (TU Delft - Geo-engineering)

Geo-engineering
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2025.107230
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Geo-engineering
Bibliographical Note
Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository ‘You share, we take care!’ – Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public. @en
Volume number
183
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This study utilises parallel discrete element method (DEM) simulations of cone penetration tests (CPTs) and pile load tests to investigate the application of direct CPT-based methods for predicting the base capacity of bored piles in layered soils. To reduce boundary effects, a coupled DEM-finite difference method (FDM) model is constructed to simulate pile load tests. The study focuses on the scale effect of pile diameter on the correction factor αb and the effectiveness of existing qc averaging methods in layered soils. Two pile diameters and three soil layering conditions, featuring a single silt layer interbedded within sand at varying depths, are considered in the simulations. Results show that both soil layering and pile displacement influence the scale effect. At small settlements (s) up to 0.3 times the pile diameter (D), the scale effect is insignificant, except when a soft layer is directly above the pile tip. At larger settlements, particularly when s > 0.5D, piles with smaller diameters show more pronounced reductions in base resistance due to a weak layer closely beneath the tip. Among the four methods evaluated, the BD-18 qc averaging method produces more consistent αb values across various soil profiles and pile diameters. Microscopic analysis reveals that soils above the tip contribute less to the pile base resistance at s/D = 0.1 than to the cone tip resistance. Additionally, the strength mobilisation levels of soils in most soil layering conditions appear similar at s/D = 0.1, supporting the proposal of a constant αb value in direct CPT-based methods.

Files

License info not available
warning

File under embargo until 01-10-2025