Investment in carbon dioxide capture and storage combined with enhanced water recovery

Journal Article (2020)
Author(s)

Jia Quan Li (Beijing Institute of Technology, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing))

Bi Ying Yu (Beijing Institute of Technology)

Bao Jun Tang (Beijing Institute of Technology)

Yunbing Hou (China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing))

Zhifu Mi (University College London)

Yaqing Shu (Transport and Planning)

Yi Ming Wei (Beijing Institute of Technology)

Transport and Planning
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.102848 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Transport and Planning
Volume number
94
Article number
102848
Downloads counter
180

Abstract

Carbon dioxide capture and storage combined with enhanced deep saline water recovery (CCS-EWR) is a potential approach to mitigate climate change. However, its investment has been a dilemma due to high costs and various uncertainties. In this study, a trinomial tree modelling-based real options approach is constructed to assess the investment in CCS-EWR retrofitting for direct coal liquefaction in China from the investor perspective. In this approach, the uncertainties in CO2 prices, capital subsidies, water resource fees, the residual lifetime of direct coal liquefaction plants, electricity prices, CO2 and freshwater transport distance, and the amount of certified emission reductions (CERs) are considered. The results show that the critical CER price for CCS-EWR retrofits is 7.15 Chinese yuan per ton (CNY/ton) higher than that (141.95 CNY/ton) for CCS retrofits. However, the exemption from water resource fees for freshwater recovered from saline water and a subsidy of 26% of the capital cost are sufficient to eliminate the negative impact of enhanced deep saline water recovery (EWR) on the investment economy of CCS-EWR. In addition, when the residual lifetime is less than 14 years, CCS-EWR projects are still unable to achieve profitability, even with flexible management and decision making; therefore, investors should abandon CCS-EWR investments. On the whole, the investment feasibility for CCS-EWR technology is not optimistic despite access to preferential policies from the government. It is necessary to establish a carbon market with a high and stable CER price.