Centre of pressure modulations in double support effectively counteract anteroposterior perturbations during gait

Journal Article (2021)
Author(s)

M. van Mierlo (University of Twente)

M. Vlutters (University of Twente)

Edwin H.F. van Asseldonk (University of Twente)

H. van der Kooij (University of Twente, TU Delft - Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control)

Research Group
Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control
Copyright
© 2021 M. van Mierlo, M. Vlutters, E. H.F. van Asseldonk, H. van der Kooij
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110637
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2021
Language
English
Copyright
© 2021 M. van Mierlo, M. Vlutters, E. H.F. van Asseldonk, H. van der Kooij
Research Group
Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control
Volume number
126
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Centre of mass (CoM) motion during human balance recovery is largely influenced by the ground reaction force (GRF) and the centre of pressure (CoP). During gait, foot placement creates a region of possible CoP locations in the following double support (DS). This study aims to increase insight into how humans modulate the CoP during DS, and which CoP modulations are theoretically possible to maintain balance in the sagittal plane. Three variables sufficient to describe the shape, length and duration of the DS CoP trajectory of the total GRF, were assessed in perturbed human walking. To counteract the forward perturbations, braking was required and all CoP variables showed modulations correlated to the observed change in CoM velocity over the DS phase. These correlations were absent after backward perturbations, when only little propulsion was needed to counteract the perturbation. Using a linearized inverted pendulum model we could explore how the observed parameter modulations are effective in controlling the CoM. The distance the CoP travels forward and the instant the leading leg was loaded largely affected the CoM velocity, while the duration mainly affected the CoM position. The simulations also showed that various combinations of CoP parameters can reach a desired CoM position and velocity at the end of DS, and that even a full recovery in the sagittal plane within DS would theoretically have been possible. However, the human subjects did not exploit the therefore required CoP modulations. Overall, modulating the CoP trajectory in DS does effectively contributes to balance recovery.