The Presence of Background Noise Extends the Competitor Space in Native and Non-Native Spoken-Word Recognition

Insights from Computational Modeling

Journal Article (2022)
Author(s)

Themis Karaminis (Edge Hill University)

Florian Hintz (Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics)

O.E. Scharenborg (TU Delft - Multimedia Computing)

Multimedia Computing
Copyright
© 2022 Themis Karaminis, Florian Hintz, O.E. Scharenborg
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13110
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 Themis Karaminis, Florian Hintz, O.E. Scharenborg
Multimedia Computing
Issue number
2
Volume number
46
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Oral communication often takes place in noisy environments, which challenge spoken-word recognition. Previous research has suggested that the presence of background noise extends the number of candidate words competing with the target word for recognition and that this extension affects the time course and accuracy of spoken-word recognition. In this study, we further investigated the temporal dynamics of competition processes in the presence of background noise, and how these vary in listeners with different language proficiency (i.e., native and non-native) using computational modeling. We developed ListenIN (Listen-In-Noise), a neural-network model based on an autoencoder architecture, which learns to map phonological forms onto meanings in two languages and simulates native and non-native spoken-word comprehension. We also examined the model's activation states during online spoken-word recognition. These analyses demonstrated that the presence of background noise increases the number of competitor words, which are engaged in phonological competition and that this happens in similar ways intra and interlinguistically and in native and non-native listening. Taken together, our results support accounts positing a “many-additional-competitors scenario” for the effects of noise on spoken-word recognition.