Tenant in Your Own House the Wickedness of Regaining Digital Sovereignty over Digital Public Infrastructures

Conference Paper (2026)
Author(s)

Nitesh Bharosa (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

Wouter Welling (Dutch Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations, The Hague)

Mark de Reuver (TU Delft - Technology, Policy and Management)

Research Group
Information and Communication Technology
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-36676-4_1 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Information and Communication Technology
Pages (from-to)
1-17
Publisher
Springer Nature
ISBN (print)
9783032366757
Event
18th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference on Electronic Participation, ePart 2026 (2026-08-30 - 2026-09-03), Athen, Greece
Page Views
3
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Escalating geopolitical tensions and technological dependencies have rendered the pursuit of digital sovereignty a paramount challenge for governments. Sovereignty is especially desirable for digital public infrastructures given their foundational role in authenticating, transacting, and exchanging information. However, the literature provides few policy strategies for sovereignty and few in-depth analyses of sovereignty challenges. Moreover, pathways towards higher levels of digital sovereignty for a digital public infrastructure are yet to be theorised and tested. This paper provides a deeper analysis of the challenges to sovereignty over digital public infrastructures, enabling governments to unearth pathways. Drawing on an empirical case study in the Netherlands and the PESTEL framework, this paper derives a set of challenges that must be addressed. The analysis shows that regaining digital sovereignty is a wicked problem with low normative consensus and many dependencies and uncertainties. This paper develops two pathways to address the wicked problem: fire-fighting measures that aim to address the immediate loss of digital sovereignty, vs fire prevention that aims to orchestrate an ecosystem of more sovereign alternatives for digital public infrastructure components. The analysis and pathways can inform policymakers looking to stimulate digital sovereignty.

Files

978-3-032-36676-4_1.pdf
(pdf | 0.585 Mb)
– Personal use only – Dutch Copyright Act (Article 25fa)
warning

File under embargo until 06-03-2027