Respiratory infection risk-based ventilation design method

Journal Article (2021)
Author(s)

J. Kurnitski (Tallinn University of Technology, Aalto University)

Martin Kiil (Tallinn University of Technology)

Pawel Wargocki (Technical University of Denmark (DTU))

Atze Boerstra (TU Delft - Support Architectural Engineering +Technology)

Olli Seppänen (SCANVAC)

Bjarne W. Olesen (Technical University of Denmark (DTU))

L. Morawska (Queensland University of Technology, University of Surrey)

Research Group
Support Architectural Engineering +Technology
Copyright
© 2021 Jarek Kurnitski, Martin Kiil, Pawel Wargocki, A.C. Boerstra, Olli Seppänen, Bjarne Olesen, Lidia Morawska
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108387
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2021
Language
English
Copyright
© 2021 Jarek Kurnitski, Martin Kiil, Pawel Wargocki, A.C. Boerstra, Olli Seppänen, Bjarne Olesen, Lidia Morawska
Research Group
Support Architectural Engineering +Technology
Volume number
206
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

A new design method is proposed to calculate outdoor air ventilation rates to control respiratory infection risk in indoor spaces. We propose to use this method in future ventilation standards to complement existing ventilation criteria based on the perceived air quality and pollutant removal. The proposed method makes it possible to calculate the required ventilation rate at a given probability of infection and quanta emission rate. Present work used quanta emission rates for SARS-CoV-2 and consequently the method can be applied for other respiratory viruses with available quanta data. The method was applied to case studies representing typical rooms in public buildings. To reduce the probability of infection, the total airflow rate per infectious person revealed to be the most important parameter to reduce the infection risk. Category I ventilation rate prescribed in the EN 16798-1 standard satisfied many but not all type of spaces examined. The required ventilation rates started from about 80 L/s per room. Large variations between the results for the selected case studies made it impossible to provide a simple rule for estimating the required ventilation rates. Consequently, we conclude that to design rooms with a low infection risk the newly developed ventilation design method must be used.