Techno-economic analysis of High-Temperature Aquifer Thermal Energy Storage in district heating systems

Journal Article (2026)
Author(s)

David Geerts (Universiteit Utrecht)

Wen Liu (Universiteit Utrecht)

Alexandros Daniilidis (TU Delft - Reservoir Engineering)

Philip J. Vardon (Geo-engineering)

Gert Jan Kramer (Universiteit Utrecht)

DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2026.101667 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Journal title
Energy Conversion and Management: X
Volume number
30
Article number
101667
Downloads counter
16
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Integrating renewable energy into district heating creates a heat supply–demand mismatch that High-Temperature Aquifer Thermal Energy Storage (HT-ATES) can help address. However, the potential greenhouse gas emission reduction and financial benefits of HT-ATES have received limited attention. Additionally, the interplay between the demand, supply components, and HT-ATES has been overlooked, while the assessment of integrating HT-ATES into a district heating system is crucial to understanding the benefits of the HT-ATES implementation. This study evaluates the integration of HT-ATES into a district heating system, focusing on both economic and environmental performance indicators. It novelly accounts for the dynamic operational interactions between HT-ATES and other system components, enabling a more realistic assessment of operational choices. The model is applied to a case study of a simplified district heating system. The results show that the relative size of the heat supplier compared to heat demand is a key determinant of the cost-effectiveness of HT-ATES. In the case study, a geothermal doublet reduced the levelized cost of heat by 25–37 €/MWh compared to a gas boiler, while also reducing reliance on fossil fuels. In contrast, HT-ATES had a limited impact on total system costs, regardless of whether it operated when stored heat was available or was used for peak shaving. Nevertheless, HT-ATES increased the renewable energy share by 9%–18% across all scenarios. Furthermore, the optimal geothermal capacity differed depending on whether HT-ATES was included. Finally, while a high renewable energy share can be cost-effective, achieving 100% renewable heat was found to be highly cost-ineffective in this case. These results support informed decision-making on HT-ATES implementation under appropriate system design conditions.