Experimental and theoretical investigation of crack width calculation methods for RC ties
Reignard Tan (Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU))
Kristoffer Eileraas (Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU))
Ola Opkvitne (Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU))
Giedrius Žirgulis (Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU))
MAN Hendriks (TU Delft - Applied Mechanics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU))
M. R. Geiker (Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU))
T. Kanstad (Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU))
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
This paper theoretically and experimentally investigates the semi-empirical formulas recommended by Eurocode 2 (EC2), fib Model Code 2010 (MC2010), and Eurocode 2 with the German National Annex (DIN) for calculating crack widths in reinforced concrete. It is shown that the formulas can be derived from the principles for the idealized behavior of RC ties. However, instead of explicitly solving the resulting differential equations, the use of simplifications leads to inconsistent formulas. An experimental study was carried out involving the testing of eight RC ties to discover the modeling uncertainty of the formulas. It was found that EC2 substantially overestimated the crack widths for the RC ties. MC2010 and DIN seemed to predict the crack widths better, but gave rather a large number of nonconservative crack width predictions. These experimental results, combined with the theoretical study, suggest that a more consistent calculation model should be formulated by explicitly solving the resulting differential equation.