Extending Dialogue beyond the Prison

The San Vittore Situated Vocabulary

Conference Paper (2026)
Author(s)

Virginia Tassinari (TU Delft - Industrial Design Engineering)

Maria Maramotti (Politecnico di Milano)

Chiara Ligi (Politecnico di Milano)

Mariana Ciancia (Politecnico di Milano)

Aurora Chiaravalloti (Politecnico di Milano)

Research Group
Society, Culture and Critique
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1145/3789493.3797330 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Research Group
Society, Culture and Critique
Pages (from-to)
134-137
Publisher
ACM
ISBN (electronic)
9798400724701
Event
19th Participatory Design Conference 2026, Vol. 3: Workshops, Situated Actions, and PDC Places, PDC 2026 (2026-06-15 - 2026-06-19), Milan, Italy
Downloads counter
21
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The Situated Action is part of San Vittore Situated Vocabulary, an ongoing participatory research project developed inside Milan's San Vittore Prison. During the PDC2026 Conference, the action is hosted at Open Casello (Milan), in close proximity to the prison, and it stages an "impossible dialogue": an indirect yet reciprocal exchange between the prison and the city, through a spatial and writing-based installation. The meanings of four key words emerged from co-design sessions with inmates, prison staff, and volunteers - Life/Death, Justice/Injustice, Responsibility, Fun/Boredom - are presented as fragmented textual constellations holding tension, silences, and contradictions embedded in everyday carcereal life. Participants are called to move through reading and informal conversation and are finally invited to live a personal response. Rather than seeking consensus, the action invites contributors to position themselves within unresolved tensions. The collected reflections will later be reintroduced inside the prison, extending the dialogue and positioning participatory design as a situated and agonistic practice that holds plurality and disagreement as conditions for coexistence.