Flight Performance Evaluation of the Flying-V

Conference Paper (2023)
Author(s)

G.J. de Zoeten (Student TU Delft)

Carmine Varriale (TU Delft - Aerospace Engineering)

Roelof Vos (TU Delft - Aerospace Engineering)

Research Group
Flight Performance and Propulsion
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2023-3484 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2023
Language
English
Research Group
Flight Performance and Propulsion
Article number
AIAA 2023-3484
ISBN (electronic)
978-1-62410-704-7
Event
AIAA AVIATION 2023 Forum (2023-06-12 - 2023-06-16), San Diego, United States
Downloads counter
545
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This study evaluates the flight performance of a Flying-V aircraft designed for transonic passenger transport. The Flying-V is a disruptive aircraft configuration that has shown to possess promising aerodynamic performance during preliminary design. It is compared to a competitor aircraft reminiscent of the Airbus A350-1000, for the same thrust-to-weight ratio and a similar number of passengers. The most common performance metrics for the take-off, landing, climbing and cruise phases have been assessed using a modular flight mechanics model. Take-off and landing performance are evaluated through flight simulation using a simple Euler method, while climb and cruise performance are evaluated in trimmed, steady-state conditions. Only instantaneous performance is available for the latter two phases. The Flying-V outperforms its competitor for basically all investigated metrics. Take-off length is shorter, mainly due to a larger tail strike attitude that reduces the minimum unstick speed. Service and absolute ceiling are higher, and its superior lift-over-drag ratio results in a 21% increase in the cruise range parameter. Landing field lengths are similar for both aircraft, but the Flying-V has a significantly larger pitch angle during approach. This causes longer de-rotation length, and a large obscured segment of the pilot’s vision which could be problematic during operations.

Files

6.2023_3484.pdf
(pdf | 6.43 Mb)
License info not available