A comparison of source localization methods with varying sizes of the phased microphone array

Conference Paper (2024)
Author(s)

A.S. Jayanthi (TU Delft - Aircraft Noise and Climate Effects)

M Snellen (TU Delft - Control & Operations)

Alireza Amiri-Simkooei (TU Delft - Aircraft Noise and Climate Effects)

P. Sijtsma (TU Delft - Aircraft Noise and Climate Effects)

Nico van Oosten (Anotec Engineering SL)

Research Group
Aircraft Noise and Climate Effects
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2024
Language
English
Research Group
Aircraft Noise and Climate Effects
Pages (from-to)
1-10
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Since 2020, all commercial aircraft have been mandated to be equipped with ADS-B Out
transponders. Despite the many advantages of locating an aircraft with openly available and
accessible data, it also has some limitations. Firstly, not all aircraft, such as general aviation, are required to transmit their locations; secondly, due to obstacles such as buildings,
a location is not always transmitted at lower altitudes (75-130 m); thirdly, it is vulnerable to cyberattacks. Therefore, while it is convenient to have ADS-B Out data, creating a
computationally efficient alternative methodology for determining the aircraft location is
advisable. This paper investigates the accuracy, efficiency, and computational cost of two
methods of source localization using data taken by an array of microphones: a global optimization (GO) method called the differential evolution (DE) and the conventional beam-
forming approach (CBF). The real-world data required as input for both methods is obtained
with a 64-microphone phased array placed at a distance of 1.14 km from Rotterdam The
Hague Airport (RTHA). The 2-dimensional flight trajectories, i.e., azimuth, and elevation
relative to the array, obtained from the GO and CBF methods, are compared with the ADS-
B Out data for approaching and departing flyovers. Furthermore, the smallest size of an
array required for satisfactory localization accuracy is investigated.