Variation in red cell transfusion practice in the intensive care unit – An international survey

Journal article (2020)

Authors

S. A. Willems Leiden University Medical Center, Sanquin Research
F. J. Kranenburg Sanquin Research, Leiden University Medical Center
S. le Cessie Leiden University Medical Center
P.J. Marang-van de Mheen Leiden University Medical Center
J. Kesecioglu University Medical Center Utrecht
J. G. van der Bom Sanquin Research, Leiden University Medical Center
M.S. Arbous Leiden University Medical Center
Affiliation
External organisation
Survey Decision-making Critical care Intensive care Red blood cell Transfusion
More Info
expand_more

Published Date

2020

Language

English

Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Affiliation

External organisation

Abstract

Purpose: Unclear recommendations in transfusion guidelines may possibly lead to inconsistency in treatment of patients admitted to the intensive care unit. This study aimed to uncover variation in red blood cell (RBC) transfusion decisions in the ICU worldwide. Methods: Members of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) were requested to complete an online questionnaire which included four different hypothetical clinical scenarios. The scenarios represented patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), abdominal sepsis, traumatic brain injury (TBI) and post-surgical complications. Hemoglobin level was 7∙3 g/dL in all scenarios. The questionnaire explored the physicians' transfusion decision in each clinical scenario and identified patient characteristics that were most influential in the transfusion decision. Results: In total 211 members participated in the study, of whom 142 (67%) completed the entire survey. Most variation was observed in the clinical scenario of sepsis, in which 49% decided to transfuse and 51% decided not to. In the clinical scenarios of AMI, TBI and post-surgical complications this was respectively; 75/25%, 35/65% and 66/34%. Conclusions: Critical care physicians differed in outcome of RBC transfusion decisions and weighed patient characteristics differently. These findings indicate that variation in transfusion practice amongst critical care physicians exists.