Reactive Scheduling Strategies for Advanced Aircraft Engine Parts Repair

Master Thesis (2026)
Author(s)

A. Maniatis (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Contributor(s)

N. Yorke-Smith – Mentor (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Paolo Monti – Mentor (KLM Royal Dutch Airlines)

Zoë Lascaris – Mentor (KLM Royal Dutch Airlines)

A. Bombelli – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Aerospace Engineering)

Faculty
Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Graduation Date
09-07-2026
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Faculty
Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science
Downloads counter
2
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

This thesis presents the development and evaluation of a scheduling framework for aircraft engine part repair tasks within the maintenance department of a major European airline. The study addresses inherent operational uncertainties, data limitations, and shortcomings of existing proactive scheduling practices. The proposed model extends the classic Resource Constrained Project Scheduling Problem (RCPSP) to one that combines multi-skill, maximum lags, and time-window constraints in a repair context. It employs a Tabu Search (TS) model with a custom lookahead decoder to increase feasibility, and integrates novel neighbourhood sampling techniques to handle large-scale operational data. The framework’s performance is assessed using a case study and sensitivity analysis to evaluate deadline adherence, schedule stability, and operational efficiency. Results demonstrate that an average tardiness objective offers the best trade-off between production efficiency and deadline adherence, and that its deadline-driven gradient yields schedules that stay robust as disruptions accumulate through the week. Different candidate lists for sampling based on the critical-path method perform on par with random sampling and show no statistically strong edge over it. Critical-path-based lists, however, rank top-two on every metric except stability and are never worst on any, supporting their use as a robust default. The findings highlight the interplay between a baseline and a repair scheduler and contribute to a more general understanding of scheduling in the repair context.

Files

License info not available
warning

File under embargo until 09-07-2028