Balancing act between research and application

How research orientation and networks affect scholars’ academic and commercial output

Journal Article (2020)
Author(s)

C. Werker (TU Delft - Economics of Technology and Innovation, RWTH Aachen University)

Christian Hopp (RWTH Aachen University)

Research Group
Economics of Technology and Innovation
Copyright
© 2020 C. Werker, Christian Hopp
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-020-00979-x
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Copyright
© 2020 C. Werker, Christian Hopp
Research Group
Economics of Technology and Innovation
Issue number
8
Volume number
90
Pages (from-to)
1171-1197
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Scholars’ balancing act between research and application leads to trade-offs between commercial and research output. Yet what some scholars may consider as poles apart might lead to super-additive outcomes for others. Based on a survey carried out at three leading European universities of technology we investigate the influence of scholars’ research orientation and networks on their output productivity. Our results point to a very specific group of ambidextrous scholars that is comparatively small. The scholars in this group are able to successfully balance research and application. In contrast, all scholars focusing on either pure basic or pure applied research face a trade-off between publications and innovations. In general, our findings suggest that the output productivity of all scholars is the higher the better their research orientation fits with their network activities. In particular, ambidextrous scholars rely on effectively accessing and utilizing their network to increase commercial and research output.

Files

License info not available