Conceptualizing community in energy systems

A systematic review of 183 definitions

Review (2022)
Author(s)

Thomas Bauwens (Universiteit Utrecht)

D.F.J. Schraven (TU Delft - Integral Design & Management)

Emily Drewing (University of Siegen)

Jörg Radtke (University of Siegen)

Lars Holstenkamp

Boris Gotchev (Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies)

Özgür Yildiz (Technical University of Berlin)

Research Group
Integral Design & Management
Copyright
© 2022 Thomas Bauwens, D.F.J. Schraven, Emily Drewing, Jörg Radtke, Lars Holstenkamp, Boris Gotchev, Özgür Yildiz
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111999
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 Thomas Bauwens, D.F.J. Schraven, Emily Drewing, Jörg Radtke, Lars Holstenkamp, Boris Gotchev, Özgür Yildiz
Research Group
Integral Design & Management
Volume number
156
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Community-based energy systems are gaining traction among policymakers and practitioners as promising models for implementing a low-carbon energy transition. As a result, there has been a proliferation of concepts in the scientific literature, such as community energy, energy communities, community solar, and community wind. However, what scholars mean by “community” in these contexts is often unclear and inconsistent. This paper provides further conceptual clarity in the field by analyzing how the term of community is conceptualized in the scholarly literature on energy systems, through a systematic review of 405 articles. We combine an author keyword network analysis of this corpus with an in-depth analysis of 183 definitions extracted from these articles and systematically coded across three dimensions: meanings, activities and objectives of communities. Our findings show that the meanings attached to the notion of community and the alleged objectives pursued by communities vary substantially across concepts and over time. In particular, there has been a shift away from a notion of community understood as a process that emphasizes participatory aspects toward a notion of community primarily referring to a place. Furthermore, there is a growing focus on communities' economic objectives rather than their social or political goals. These findings suggest a weakening of scholars’ attention to “transformative” notions of community emphasizing collective and grassroots processes of participation in energy transitions, to the benefit of “instrumental” notions. This trend runs the risk of placing the sole emphasis on the market value of communities, thereby diluting their distinctiveness from more commercial actors.