Mitigating Uncertainty in an Extended-Arrival Manager Environment

Evaluating Pop-Up Flight Mitigation Strategies Using Stochastic Uncertainty Models

Master Thesis (2026)
Author(s)

J. van Beek (TU Delft - Aerospace Engineering)

Contributor(s)

J. Ellerbroek – Mentor (TU Delft - Aerospace Engineering)

F. Dijkstra – Mentor (Luchtverkeersleiding Nederland)

Faculty
Aerospace Engineering
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2026
Language
English
Graduation Date
12-05-2026
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Programme
Aerospace Engineering
Sponsors
Luchtverkeersleiding Nederland
Faculty
Aerospace Engineering
Downloads counter
22
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Extended Arrival Management (E-AMAN) enables earlier sequencing and upstream delay absorption by extending the freeze horizon, but increases exposure to prediction uncertainty and pop-up flights, which can degrade planning stability. This study presents the BlueSky AMAN Simulator (BAMS) and evaluates how stochastic uncertainty and pop-up mitigation strategies affect E-AMAN performance at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol.

Paired Monte-Carlo experiments are performed for freeze horizons of 14, 20, and 25 minutes under stochastic take-off, departure-route, and en-route uncertainty. Multiple mitigation strategies are evaluated, including Back-of-the-Line (BOL) scheduling, delayed-slot scheduling, and enabling planning at take-off.

The results show a clear trade-off between earlier planning and stability. Pop-up flights primarily drive sequence disruptions, while trajectory prediction uncertainty mainly increases temporal instability through repeated Expected Approach Time (EAT) revisions. Among the evaluated strategies, BOL scheduling at a 20-minute freeze horizon provides a balance between stability and delay performance, while longer horizons show diminishing returns due to uncertainty propagation. In addition, planning at take-off is shown to improve performance in both current and extended AMAN operations.

The findings indicate that feasible E-AMAN implementation at Schiphol requires either reduced uncertainty or stability-preserving scheduling strategies.