A combined forecasting and packing model for air cargo loading: A risk-averse framework

Journal Article (2022)
Author(s)

I. Tseremoglou (TU Delft - Air Transport & Operations)

A. Bombelli (TU Delft - Air Transport & Operations)

Bruno F. Santos (TU Delft - Air Transport & Operations)

Research Group
Air Transport & Operations
Copyright
© 2022 I. Tseremoglou, A. Bombelli, Bruno F. Santos
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102579
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 I. Tseremoglou, A. Bombelli, Bruno F. Santos
Research Group
Air Transport & Operations
Volume number
158
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

In this paper, we present a combined forecasting and optimization decision-support tool to assist air cargo revenue management departments in the acceptance/rejection process of incoming cargo bookings. We consider the case of a combination airline and focus on the passenger aircraft belly capacity. The process is dynamic (bookings are received in a discrete fashion during the booking horizon) and uncertain (for some bookings the three dimensions are not provided, while the actual belly space available for cargo is only revealed a few hours before departure). Hence, analysts base decisions on historical data or human experience, which might yield sub-optimal or infeasible solutions due to the aforementioned uncertainties. We tackle them by proposing data-driven algorithms to predict available cargo space and shipment dimensions. A packing problem is solved sequentially once a new booking request is received, predicting shipment dimensions, if necessary, and considering the uncertainty of such prediction. The booking is accepted if it results in a feasible loading configuration where no previously accepted booking is offloaded. When applied in a deterministic context, our packing method outperformed the one used by the partner airline, increasing the loaded volume up to 20%. The framework was also tested assuming unknown shipment dimensions, comparing a risk-prone and a risk-averse strategy, with the latter accounting for uncertainty in dimension predictions and the former using mean values. While the average loaded volume decreases in the risk-averse case, the number of unplanned offloadings due to under-predicted dimensions decreases from 54% to 12% of the simulated cases, hence yielding a more robust acceptance strategy.