Machine learning in prospective LCA
insights from a systematic literature review
Nils Pauliks (Universiteit Leiden)
Franco Donati (Universiteit Leiden)
J.M. Weber (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)
Bernhard Steubing (Universiteit Leiden)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) offers considerable opportunities for advancing life cycle assessment (LCA), yet a consolidated overview of ML models with potential for prospective LCA (pLCA) is still missing. This systematic review identifies ML models suited to pLCA's data needs and assesses the transferability of retrospective LCA models to pLCA. We apply keyword-based and automated forward/backward searches to identify studies based on algorithm type, training datasets, input/output variables, and performance metrics. We identify 50 publications and classify them into four ML application groups: (1) streamlined LCA, (2) life cycle inventory data prediction, (3) impact category prediction, and (4) characterization factor prediction. Among these, predicting life cycle inventory (LCI) data and characterization factor estimation are directly applicable to pLCA. Life cycle inventory data prediction and streamlined LCA represent the largest body of literature, offering benefits such as estimating missing unit process data, leveraging large external datasets, advanced simulation of process parameters, identifying molecular substitutes, or the employment of rapid screening tools. While characterization factor prediction shows potential, it requires further research for practical implementation. Overall, ML is rarely applied directly to pLCA. However, many ML models developed for retrospective LCA have the potential to be transferred to pLCA, either directly or with adaptations to data structures. This is most evident for predicting missing or technology-specific life cycle inventory data, where similarity-based learning, simulation-enhanced models, and large datasets offer scalable ways to estimate future inventory parameters. Across all groups, uncertainty is insufficiently assessed, with only a minority of studies addressing model, parameter, or scenario uncertainty. Overall, ML holds potential for pLCA when applied with methodological care and attention to underlying uncertainties.