Intercomparison of methods of coupling between convection and large-scale circulation

1. Comparison over uniform surface conditions

Journal Article (2015)
Author(s)

C. L. Daleu (University of Reading)

R. S. Plant (University of Reading)

S. J. Woolnough (University of Reading)

S. Sessions (New Mexico Tech)

M. J. Herman (New Mexico Tech)

A. Sobel (Columbia University)

S. Wang (Columbia University)

D. Kim (University of Washington)

A. Cheng (NASA Langley Research Center)

G. Bellon (The University of Auckland)

P. Peyrille (Meteo France)

F. Ferry (Meteo France)

P. Siebesma (TU Delft - Atmospheric Remote Sensing, TU Delft - Atmospheric Physics, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI))

L. Van Ulft (Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI))

DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015MS000468 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2015
Language
English
Issue number
4
Volume number
7
Pages (from-to)
1576-1601
Downloads counter
353
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

As part of an international intercomparison project, a set of single-column models (SCMs) and cloud-resolving models (CRMs) are run under the weak-temperature gradient (WTG) method and the damped gravity wave (DGW) method. For each model, the implementation of the WTG or DGW method involves a simulated column which is coupled to a reference state defined with profiles obtained from the same model in radiative-convective equilibrium. The simulated column has the same surface conditions as the reference state and is initialized with profiles from the reference state. We performed systematic comparison of the behavior of different models under a consistent implementation of the WTG method and the DGW method and systematic comparison of the WTG and DGW methods in models with different physics and numerics. CRMs and SCMs produce a variety of behaviors under both WTG and DGW methods. Some of the models reproduce the reference state while others sustain a large-scale circulation which results in either substantially lower or higher precipitation compared to the value of the reference state. CRMs show a fairly linear relationship between precipitation and circulation strength. SCMs display a wider range of behaviors than CRMs. Some SCMs under the WTG method produce zero precipitation. Within an individual SCM, a DGW simulation and a corresponding WTG simulation can produce different signed circulation. When initialized with a dry troposphere, DGW simulations always result in a precipitating equilibrium state. The greatest sensitivities to the initial moisture conditions occur for multiple stable equilibria in some WTG simulations, corresponding to either a dry equilibrium state when initialized as dry or a precipitating equilibrium state when initialized as moist. Multiple equilibria are seen in more WTG simulations for higher SST. In some models, the existence of multiple equilibria is sensitive to some parameters in the WTG calculations.