A new criticality analysis approach for infrastructure components

New FMECA approach for Infrastructure asset management

Master Thesis (2019)
Author(s)

R.T. Ganesh (TU Delft - Civil Engineering & Geosciences)

Contributor(s)

Rogier Rogier Wolfert – Mentor (TU Delft - Materials and Environment)

Martine van den Boomen – Graduation committee member (TU Delft - Integral Design & Management)

J.S. Hoving – Coach (TU Delft - Offshore Engineering)

Faculty
Civil Engineering & Geosciences
Copyright
© 2019 Vikram Ganesh
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Copyright
© 2019 Vikram Ganesh
Graduation Date
18-04-2019
Awarding Institution
Delft University of Technology
Programme
['Civil Engineering | Construction Management and Engineering']
Faculty
Civil Engineering & Geosciences
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Infrastructures have become important for the holistic growth of any country. With the number of such projects being constantly on the rise each year, its efficient maintenance has become a primary requirement for any asset owner. Among the many techniques available, FMECA is widely used for maintenance planning. In this method, different critical components are identified based on their likelihood of failure and impact on the infrastructure. Based on the inferences obtained, maintenance plans are developed where interventions are prioritized based on a component’s criticality within the system. FMECA uses risk matrices to assess criticalities semi-quantitatively. This lacks the required quantifiable information of a component in a system. A component by design can either be individual or exist as a subsystem comprising several components. To analyze criticalities accurately, quantitative information that can provide insights on a component’s state in the system is required. Hence, this thesis develops a new approach that could eliminate subjective errors in conventional criticality analysis. The new and conventional approach was applied to two infrastructures to observe and discuss the variations in results obtained. The comparative study showcased that the new approach provided better quantitative reasonings for criticalities obtained for each component. Using the unique implementation of the obtained quantitative data as done in the current research, developing realistic and accurate maintenance strategies is possible.

Files

CME2000_Thesis_Report_Ragavend... (pdf)
(pdf | 1.14 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 15-04-2022
License info not available