Path Dependence in Financing Urban Infrastructure Development in China: 1949–2016

Journal Article (2017)
Author(s)

Changjie Zhan (TU Delft - Organisation & Governance)

Martin de Jong (TU Delft - Organisation & Governance)

J.A. de Bruijn (TU Delft - Multi Actor Systems)

Research Group
Organisation & Governance
Copyright
© 2017 C. Zhan, W.M. de Jong, J.A. de Bruijn
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2017.1334862
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2017
Language
English
Copyright
© 2017 C. Zhan, W.M. de Jong, J.A. de Bruijn
Research Group
Organisation & Governance
Pages (from-to)
1-21
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

In the past few decades, urban infrastructures in China have seen an enormous upgrade, and due to large-scale urbanization many more investments are due in the coming years. In order to supplement public funding, Public Private Partnerships (PPP) and municipal bonds have recently grown popular in China. The introduction of this new policy does not occur in a void but should be understood as the path-dependent consequence of a historical evolution of funding arrangements for urban development. How have Chinese governments traditionally arranged financing for these extensive investments and how has the emphasis in funding sources shifted over time? We argue that the evolution of urban development financing has gone through three phases (planned economy, reform and pilot, and socialist market economy), each with different emphasis in financial sources. Our analysis demonstrates how weaknesses in earlier phases present challenges that new solutions in later phases are aimed to address.