Reduction of cost, energy and emissions of the formalin production process via methane steam reforming

Journal Article (2021)
Author(s)

Jan Puhar (University of Maribor)

Annamaria Vujanović (University of Maribor)

Peter Awad (TU Delft - ChemE/Delft Ingenious Design)

Lidija Čuček (University of Maribor)

DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.3390/systems9010005 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2021
Language
English
Issue number
1
Volume number
9
Article number
5
Pages (from-to)
1-17
Downloads counter
159
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Production of formalin, which is among the highest production volume chemicals, is highly energy-intensive; thus, reduction of energy use is very important in reducing cost and emissions. The aim of this and its larger overall research is to systemically analyze how to improve sustainability of processes producing formalin as an intermediate or final product. In this part of the work, energy consumption requirements are analyzed for the conventional formalin production process via methane steam reforming, where opportunities for energy consumption reduction are identified. This work will serve as a base case for further investigation of alternative formalin production pathways. To achieve energy savings, heat integration technology by combined pinch analysis and mathematical programming is applied. The formalin production process is simulated using Aspen HYSYS, and heat integration of the production process was performed based on simulated design using GAMS software. Economic and environmental footprint analyses were performed for both non-integrated and integrated designs. Results show that heat integration reduces heat consumption by around 39%, leading to a saving of 11% in capital cost and turning annual operating cost into positive revenue. Heat integration also improves the environmental aspect, where a 7-22% reduction in selected environmental footprints is achieved.