Educational engagement, expectation and attainment of children with disabilities

Evidence from the Scottish Longitudinal Study

Journal Article (2019)
Author(s)

F.M. Cox (University of St Andrews, TU Delft - Urban Studies)

Alan D. Marshall (The University of Edinburgh)

Research Group
Urban Studies
Copyright
© 2019 F.M. Cox, Alan D. Marshall
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3576
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Copyright
© 2019 F.M. Cox, Alan D. Marshall
Research Group
Urban Studies
Issue number
1
Volume number
46 (2020)
Pages (from-to)
222-246
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Government statistics show that children with special educational needs and disabilities do not achieve as well academically as their peers, which impacts on later employment and socioeconomic circumstances. Addressing these inequalities is a key policy area which currently lacks a satisfactory evidence base. To explore the issue, the present study used data from the Scottish Longitudinal Study which contains data from the 1991, 2001 and 2011 censuses along with other administrative data, from a representative sample of the Scottish population. Using this large and longitudinal sample, the present study examines educational engagement, expectations and attainment for children with self-reported disability, controlling for other early childhood factors. The results show that children with mental health problems were at higher risk of leaving school early, and that children with learning difficulties were less likely to gain advanced qualifications. Neither limiting long-term illness in early childhood nor disability in adolescence were significant predictors of engagement, however, they did predict measures of academic expectation and attainment. Results suggest there is a critical phase for attainment, with area deprivation in early childhood but not adolescence being important for later educational inequalities.