Using scaffolding to formalize digital coach support for low-literate learners

Journal Article (2020)
Author(s)

Dylan G.M. Schouten (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Pim Massink (Universiteit Utrecht)

Stella F. Donker (Universiteit Utrecht)

Mark A. Neerincx (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Research Group
Interactive Intelligence
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-020-09278-0 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Research Group
Interactive Intelligence
Journal title
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
Issue number
2
Volume number
31 (2021)
Pages (from-to)
183-223
Downloads counter
237
Collections
Institutional Repository
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

In this study, we attempt to specify the cognitive support behavior of a previously designed embodied conversational agent coach that provides learning support to low-literates. Three knowledge gaps are identified in the existing work: an incomplete specification of the behaviors that make up ‘support,’ an incomplete specification of how this support can be personalized, and unclear speech recognition rules. We use the socio-cognitive engineering method to update our foundation of knowledge with new online banking exercises, low-level scaffolding and user modeling theory, and speech recognition. We then refine the design of our coach agent by creating comprehensive cognitive support rules that adapt support based on learner needs (the ‘Generalized’ approach) and attune the coach’s support delay to user performance in previous exercises (the ‘Individualized’ approach). A prototype is evaluated in a 3-week within- and between-subjects experiment. Results show that the specified cognitive support is effective: Learners complete all exercises, interact meaningfully with the coach, and improve their online banking self-efficacy. Counter to hypotheses, the Individualized approach does not improve on the Generalized approach. Whether this indicates suboptimal operationalization or a deeper problem with the Individualized approach remains as future work.