Environmental crisis, sectoral versus integral: The agency of change

Dialogue

Journal Article (2021)
Author(s)

C. Zevenbergen (TU Delft - Urban Design)

C.M. Hein (TU Delft - History, Form & Aesthetics)

Lars Marcus (Chalmers University of Technology)

Research Group
Urban Design
Copyright
© 2021 C. Zevenbergen, C.M. Hein, Lars Marcus
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.48438/jdu.2.2021.6723
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2021
Language
English
Copyright
© 2021 C. Zevenbergen, C.M. Hein, Lars Marcus
Research Group
Urban Design
Issue number
2
Pages (from-to)
47-52
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Today we experience and acknowledge the nexus of ecology, culture and politics as a moving objective, defined by local realities placed within global developments. Large-scale change is no longer a distant probability but an approaching condition, which forces us to accept instability and envision sustainability transitions as the ground of future inhabitation. When looking closer into atmospheric, water (riverine, maritime, deltaic), and land systems and their inherent uncertainties we realize the agency that local sensitivities, culture and planning regimes have in defining the success or failure of sustainable development. This dialogue will question what the real ground of preMarsent and future urbanization is, imagining adaptive and transformative change as material and ecologically sensitive practices to site, context and culture.

This dialogue is the transcription of the round table talk on the International Forum on Urbanism held in Delft on 26 November 2021. Lars Marcus, Chris Zevenbergen and Carola Hein presented their work in the light of the environmental crisis, sectoral versus integral: the agency of change. With moderator Fransje Hooimeijer they elaborated and related their work in a discussion around the main questions of history, the longue durée, disciplinarity and agency of change.

Files

License info not available